Vidium SearchLight DNA

The DNA Report Did Not Give Us a Cure. It Gave Us a Map.

This page explains how Oscar's molecular report shaped questions for my oncologist. It is not a dosing guide or treatment protocol.

When Oscar was diagnosed, the cancer felt like one thing: TCC. Bladder. Trigone. Maybe six months. Then the DNA report came back, and the cancer became more specific — not less serious, not less frightening, but more knowable.

Separately, a BRAF mutation test was positive in April 2025, prior to the oncology consult — supporting the urothelial/TCC picture before the full tumor DNA map arrived.

The tumor DNA test was a Vidium SearchLight DNA profile: Accession SL25-000232, received 05/05/25, reported 05/12/25. Site: trigonal urethral. Diagnosis on the report: urothelial carcinoma. Matching drugs listed on the report (including olaparib, platinum, trametinib, sirolimus, and others) were framed for us as a map for questions with my oncologist — not prescriptions to start on our own.

FindingPlain meaningTreatment questionEvidence tier
BRCA1 copy-number lossPossible DNA-repair weaknessShould platinum chemo and PARP inhibition be considered?Platinum B PARP C
PDGFRA copy-number gainPossible growth-factor / receptor signalingIs RTK targeting (e.g. Palladia/toceranib) rational?B/C
NF1 p.Ser1045fsPossible loss of a MAPK pathway brakeIs MEK inhibition (e.g. trametinib) rational if disease progresses?B/C
TSC2 copy-number lossPossible mTOR pathway activationIs mTOR inhibition (e.g. sirolimus) worth discussing?C/D
ABCB1-1ΔMDR1 / drug-sensitivity genotypeAny dosing-caution questions for my oncologist?Not detected
BRAF+Common canine TCC mutation test — positive April 2025 (prior to oncology consult)Supported urothelial/TCC diagnosis and early planningConfirmed

Logic chains (questions, not prescriptions)

BRCA1

DNA repair weaknessplatinum / PARP questioncarboplatin / olaparib discussion

PDGFRA

Growth signalingRTK questionPalladia discussion

NF1

MAPK brake failureMEK questiontrametinib later

TSC2

mTOR signalingmTOR questionsirolimus Rx/discussed May 2026; never started
What the report did not do. It did not guarantee a response, prove future metastases would share the same drivers, remove the need for monitoring, make supplements safe, or make every plausible drug worth stacking. Caption for any diagram: “This explains why we asked certain questions. It is not a treatment protocol.”

Next: treatment phases · molecular interpreter sample prompt